文献综述批判与优化
对文献综述节选进行范围局限性和综合弱点的批判性评估，识别具体问题，提出改进建议，并使用结构化量规进行评分。
原文 · 永不改动
Critique this literature review excerpt for scope limitations and synthesis weaknesses that obscure important perspectives. Identify four specific issues: geographic bias excluding Global South research with valuable context-specific insights, disciplinary siloing missing interdisciplinary connections between computer science and social science approaches, confirmation bias in source selection favoring predetermined conclusions about algorithmic neutrality, and descriptive summarization without critical analysis of power dynamics and positionality in cited studies. Propose three improvements: systematic search protocol documentation with inclusion/exclusion rationale transparency including language diversity considerations, thematic synthesis framework mapping agreements and disagreements across studies with attention to epistemic justice, and reflexivity statement acknowledging reviewer positionality and potential blind spots regarding marginalized perspectives. Evaluate using a comprehensiveness rubric scoring geographic diversity (1-5), disciplinary integration (1-5), critical synthesis depth (1-5), and transparency (1-5). Constraints: Keep it under 350 words; Use clear section headings; Include exactly three key takeaways.
提示词原文按纯文本转义渲染（防 XSS）；「一键复制」取出的是原始字节，不是排版后的文本。原文始终不翻译。
用法说明
当需要对文献综述进行严格、结构化的学术批判（聚焦于偏见、综合质量和方法论透明度）时使用此提示词。
参数要点
无需额外参数，提示词本身包含明确的评估标准与约束条件。
适用场景
学术研究、同行评审与文献综合评估。