文献综述方法论批判
对神经可塑性与双语研究的文献综述进行方法论严谨性批判，识别四个具体弱点，提出三个具体改进建议，并使用五分制评分标准进行评估。
原文 · 永不改动
Critique this neuroplasticity and bilingualism literature review for methodological rigor. Identify at least four specific weaknesses: publication bias toward positive findings, inadequate quality assessment of included studies, insufficient handling of heterogeneity across age groups, and geographic sampling limitations. Propose three concrete improvements: implementing funnel plot analysis, adopting standardized risk-of-bias tools, and stratifying meta-analysis by developmental stage. Evaluate using a five-point rubric scoring comprehensiveness, methodological transparency, bias mitigation, and synthesis quality.
提示词原文按纯文本转义渲染（防 XSS）；「一键复制」取出的是原始字节，不是排版后的文本。原文始终不翻译。
用法说明
用于严格评估认知科学和教育学领域的学术初稿、元分析或系统评价。
参数要点
无需特殊参数。可通过替换主题文本适用于不同的学术论文。
适用场景
学术同行评审、研究方法培训或论文指导。