教育技术文献综述批判与认识论公正评估

Critique this educational technology literature review for generative AI coverage gaps and methodological rigor issues. Identify four flaws: overreliance on vendor-funded studies without conflict-of-interest disclosure, omission of critical perspectives on labor displacement in education, superficial treatment of bias issues limited to demographic representation without examining epistemic justice concerns, and chronological organization obscuring conceptual relationships between studies. Suggest three remediations: conflict-of-interest screening protocol for included studies, inclusion criteria mandating diverse epistemological perspectives, and concept-mapping synthesis approach replacing chronological narrative. Evaluate using an epistemic justice framework scoring representation diversity (1-5), power analysis depth (1-5), and solution pluralism (1-5). Respond in bullet points. Constraints: Keep it under 350 words; Use clear section headings; Include exactly three key takeaways.