Methodological Citation Critique
Critiques a citation summary for methodological transparency issues, identifies four specific problems, proposes three concrete improvements, and evaluates using a transparency rubric with revision examples.
original · never modified
Critique this citation summary for methodological transparency issues. Identify four specific problems: omitted sampling methodology details, unverified causal claims, missing effect size context, ambiguous timeframe references. Propose three concrete improvements: add CONSORT flow diagram reference, specify confidence interval interpretation, include limitation acknowledgment template. Evaluate using transparency rubric: methodology clarity (1-5), claim accuracy (1-5), statistical context (1-5), limitation disclosure (yes/no). Provide exact revision examples for each weakness.
Prompt text is rendered as plain text (XSS-safe). “Copy” yields the original bytes. Originals are never translated.
How to use
Use this prompt to rigorously evaluate academic citations, research summaries, or paper drafts for methodological transparency, statistical reporting, and limitation disclosure.
Parameter notes
Input text should be a citation summary or research excerpt that requires methodological auditing.
Best for
Academic Research & Peer Review